Joined
·
8 Posts
I am getting my first bike at the age of 46. A used Boulevard C50/M50 is my top choice at the moment.
The shaft drive is one of my determining factors. I'm not much of a mechanic, and I have no interest in becoming one. The low-maintenance nature of shaft driven bikes appeals to me.
But then I learned I shouldn't rule out belts as they are about as low maintenance as shaft drives. BUT if a belt fails, that's relatively inexpensive while a shaft drive failure would be expensive.
I know there are other posts comparing drives, but here's my more specific question:
Would I be wrong to compare the replacement/repair cost of shaft vs belt when deciding on a bike? Or to put it another way: is it truly rare that a shaft drive would fail on a Suzuki? Should I not worry about all that and just get the bike that I like (having ruled out carbs).
The shaft drive is one of my determining factors. I'm not much of a mechanic, and I have no interest in becoming one. The low-maintenance nature of shaft driven bikes appeals to me.
But then I learned I shouldn't rule out belts as they are about as low maintenance as shaft drives. BUT if a belt fails, that's relatively inexpensive while a shaft drive failure would be expensive.
I know there are other posts comparing drives, but here's my more specific question:
Would I be wrong to compare the replacement/repair cost of shaft vs belt when deciding on a bike? Or to put it another way: is it truly rare that a shaft drive would fail on a Suzuki? Should I not worry about all that and just get the bike that I like (having ruled out carbs).